THE DEMOCRATS SENATORS MOVES FORWARD THE IRAN TREATY TO FUND ITS AMBITION OF DESTROYING ISRAEL TO THE LIKES AND AGENDA OF THE LEFTIST DEMOCRATS AND POTUS BHO CHAOS– POSSIBLE ALL DEMOCRATS TO VOTE EXCEPT FOR THE GREAT PRETENDERS CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY) BOB THE BUILDER MENENDEZ (D-NJ) FOR THE TREATY ASSURING THE POTUS OF CHAOS TO STAB ISRAEL IN THE BACK–AS THE LAME DUCK BARBARA MIKULSKI (D-MD) ON HER LAST RUNNING YEAR LEG GETS OFF THE PEDESTAL TO PUSH FORWARD THE POTUS AGENDA

RUSH: Is anybody surprised? You should not be surprised that Obama got the votes that he wanted. And I'm gonna maintain to you right now that that was always in the cards once Chuck Schumer decided to vote against it.

Sorry if this sounds like an attack on Senator Schumer. I don't doubt that his opposition to this is principled, in part. But when I saw that Schumer was gonna vote against it and the story came, gonna be three or four to follow him along, it told me everything I needed to know. It meant that his vote "no" was safe, that it was gonna pass, his "no" vote was not gonna harm Obama. And I didn't doubt that this gonna pass anyway because of the Corker Bill. The Corker Bill made it impossible for this thing not to pass.

Yes. Republican Senator Bob Corker, Tennessee, totally reversing the ratification process for treaties.

And the simple explanation for what that means is, the president has to get... And I know it's not a treaty, but it is. I mean, it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck; it's a duck! It's a treaty. But Obama didn't want to call it a treaty because he didn't want to have to go through the constitutional requirements for ratification, which essentially two-thirds of the Senate must vote for it. Well, the Corker Bill! The Corker Bill said, "No, no!

"You know what? We're gonna suspend that! We're gonna change it, and what we need is, we need to get two-thirds of the Senate to vote 'no' in order to stop it, with a couple other ancillary requirements." It wasn't gonna happen. And if you're still puzzled over this, if you really thought that there was a chance that the Senate was going to vote "no" on this -- and I'm not trying to be a know-it-all cynic -- I remind you of what Mitch McConnell recently said about defunding Planned Parenthood, all right?

Now, let's go back to 2010. Republican voters are angry that the Republicans in Congress are not doing more to stop Obamacare. Now, back in 2010 there really wasn't much they could do. They didn't vote for it. There was not a single Republican vote for it, but they weren't speaking out against it forcefully. They weren't trying to create any allies on the Democrats to vote against it. Of course, in Obama's first term, Democrat loyalty and all that. The Republicans said, "Look, all we have here is the House.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3332253/posts