The
U.S. Army has 6,000
M1 Abrams tanks
and for years has been saying that it doesn't need any more, but the
service is requesting $558 million for more tanks in the latest budget.
"There's an industrial base piece to all of that," Maj. Gen. Neil
Thurgood, the Army's deputy for acquisition and systems management, said
Wednesday of the funding that will go to the General Dynamics Corps.
plant in Lima, Ohio, the only tank manufacturer in the U.S.
Thurgood said the money would improve the Abrams' maneuverability and
defenses, and also give its 120mm main smoothbore gun more range.
"You want to be able to shoot further than the person shooting at you," he said.
The main reason for funding more tanks was, "we want to preserve our
national ability to maintain that technology base" in U.S. heavy
industry if needed in time of war, Thurgood said.
Beginning in 2012, former Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond Odierno
began testifying to Congress that the Army had more than enough tanks,
even suggesting that the line at General Dynamics be frozen temporarily.
In 2012, Odierno testified that "we don't need the tanks," and said
he'd rather use the money to spend on modernizing other weapons systems
and platforms. "Our tank fleet is two and a half years old on average
now. We're in good shape and these are additional tanks that we don't
need," he said.
Last year, after Congress put more money for tanks back into the
budget, Rep. Mac Thornberry, a Texas Republican and chairman of the
House Armed Services Committee, said that keeping the line alive at
General Dynamics showed that Congress was not a "rubber stamp."
"We made a judgment call" just as the Army was considering sending
more tanks to Europe in response to the Ukraine crisis, Thornberry said.
"That might be some evidence that Congress made the right call."
Thurgood was among several top Army officers who met in a roundtable
session with defense reporters at the Pentagon on a range of issues
stemming from the Defense Department's fiscal 2017 budget request
presentation Tuesday.
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/02/11/ohio-wins-again-in-armys-budget-for-more-m1-abrams-tanks.html