THE LATEST ON BROWSER USERS ARE IN AS FIREFOX USERS AND CHROME USRS HAVE A GREATER JOB SATISFACTION IN THE WORK FORCE AND WILLING TO STAY ON THE JOB LONGER THAN SAY SAFARI AND INTERNET EXPLORER

IN his best-selling new book, Originals: How Non-Conformists Move the World, Wharton professor Adam Grant — a recent TED speaker — explores why some people are more successful than others in championing new ideas. In this brief excerpt from the first chapter, he shares some surprising discoveries about what people reveal about themselves when they choose a web browser for their computer.

Not long ago, economist Michael Housman was leading a project to figure out why some customer service agents stayed in their jobs longer than others. Armed with data from more than 30,000 employees who handled calls for banks, airlines, and cell-phone companies, he suspected that their employment histories would contain telltale signs about their commitment.
He thought that people with a history of job-hopping would quit sooner, but they didn’t: Employees who had held five jobs in the past five years weren’t any more likely to leave their positions than those who had stayed in the same job for five years.
Hunting for other hints, he noticed that his team had captured information about which internet browser employees had used when they logged in to apply for their jobs. On a whim, he tested whether that choice might be related to quitting. He didn’t expect to find any correlation, assuming that browser preference was purely a matter of taste. But when he looked at the results, he was stunned: Employees who used Firefox or Chrome to browse the web remained in their jobs 15 per cent longer than those who used internet Explorer or Safari.
Thinking it was a coincidence, Housman ran the same analysis for absences from work. The pattern was the same: Firefox and Chrome users were 19 per cent less likely to miss work than internet Explorer and Safari fans.
Then he looked at performance. His team had assembled nearly three million data points on sales, customer satisfaction, and average call length. The Firefox and Chrome users had significantly higher sales, and their call times were shorter. Their customers were happier, too: After 90 days on the job, the Firefox and Chrome users had customer satisfaction levels that internet Explorer and Safari users reached only after 120 days at work.


http://www.news.com.au/technology/online/what-your-web-browser-says-about-you/news-story/c577c19e272aadaa18bc82fe2a456957

SINCE THE DEMOCRAT POTUS BHO CAME INTO OFFICE IN 2008 THE WORLD HAS BECOME THE WORLD OF THE LEFTISTS FOR THE TIME TO ACT ON THE SOUTH SEA ISLAND RECLAIMED FOR MILITARY WAS NEEDED BACK IN 2008 AND NOW FAST FORWARD TO 2016 THE POTUS DEMOCRAT BHO WILL PASS ALONG HIS FAILED POLICIES FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO FIX AS THE FORTIFIED ISLANDS BY THE COMMUNIST CHINA IS NOW COMPLETE AND THE WORLD IS NO LONGER SAFE FROM THE LAND GRABBING COMMUNISTS AS THE LEFTIST POTUS HAS HANDED THE PRICE OF MILITARY FORT SINCE 2008 AND CHINA NOW READY TO GO TO WAR FOR THEM EVEN AS THE INTERNATIONAL WORLD COURT WOULD JUDGE CHINA

A senior Chinese admiral strongly defended his country's activities in the South China Sea Sunday, restating Beijing's sovereignty in the region and warning it "had no fear of trouble."

Admiral Sun Jianguo, deputy chief of general staff of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, addressed the tensions resulting from overlapping territorial claims in the South China Sea at the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, an annual conference on security in the Asia-Pacific region.

Chinese Admiral Sun Jianguo speaks at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Sunday.

Sun said that the issue had "become overheated because of provocations of certain countries for their own selfish interests." He also reiterated that Beijing would not recognize a pending decision of an international tribunal in The Hague in a case brought by the Philippines contesting China's claim to some territory in the region.

"We do not make trouble, but we have no fear of trouble," he said. "China will not bear the consequences, nor will it allow any infringement upon its sovereignty and security interests or stay indifferent to the irresponsible behavior of some countries in and around the South China Sea."

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/05/asia/china-admiral-south-china-sea/index.html

THE DEMOCRAT AIDING AND ABETTING THE ENEMY FRONT AND CENTER RUNNER FOR POTUS 2016 HILLARY CLINTON CANNOT SHAKE THE CRAP STUCK TO HER AS MORE OF HER EMAIL INFORMATION AS ROUTED OUTSIDE OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT THROUGH HER PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER TO KEEP HER SECRETS FROM BEING PRIED MY THE STATE COMES TO LIGHT AS INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS NAMES ARE MENTIONED AMONG NATIONAL SECRETS ROUTED TO HER UNPROTECTED SERVER - THUS THE DEMOCRATS HAVE A POTENTIAL POTUS ALREADY WITH THE CARPET BAG OF CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOR EVEN BEFORE TAKING THE HIGHEST OFFICE IN THE LAND OF THE USA - BUT THEN THESE ARE DEMOCRATS AND CORRUPTION IS BUT NOTHING TO THEM

Federal records reveal that Clinton swapped these highly classified names on an email account that was vulnerable to attack and was breached repeatedly by Russia-linked hacker attempts. These new revelations — reminiscent of the Valerie Plame scandal during George W. Bush’s tenure — could give FBI investigators the evidence they need to make a case that Clinton violated the Espionage Act by mishandling national defense information through “gross negligence.”
Numerous names cited in Clinton’s emails have been redacted in State Department email releases with the classification code “B3 CIA PERS/ORG,” a highly specialized classification that means the information, if released, would violate the Central Intelligence Act of 1949.
The State Department produced a document to Judicial Watch in April 2014 that identifies different types of “(b)(3)” redactions, including “CIA PERS/ORG,” which it defines as information “Specifically exempted from disclosure by statute … Central Intelligence Act of 1949.”
“That’s what it suggests,” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton told Breitbart News, referring to the indication that Clinton disclosed the names of CIA-protected intelligence sources, based on the B3 redactions.


http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/02/hillary-clinton-exchanged-cia-officers-names-private-server/