Friday, January 21, 2011

LIBERAL JUDGES IN JERSEY SHORE FLEXES UNCONSTITUTIONAL POWERS

THE LIBERALS USES ANTONYM LABELS IN PLACE OF WHAT IT REALLY MEANS. WHEN FREEDOM OR LIBERTY IS EXTOLLED BY THESE BUNCH OF MARXIST LOVING RULING JUDGES THEY PRACTICE NOTHING MORE THAN STALINIST TYPE OF RULE.

THIS BRAZEN BEHAVIOR STEMS BACK TO THE 2002 ELECTION OF SEN  FRANK LAUTENBERG'S NAME TO BE ADDED BACK ON THE ELECTION BALLOT IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT RACE.

IF YOU WANT TO SEE JUDGES RULING WITH CORRUPTIBLE DECISION GO TO NJ.

New Jersey Democrats chose 78-year-old Frank Lautenberg late Tuesday as their new candidate after Torricelli abruptly withdrew from the race Monday.

The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the substitution of Frank Lautenberg for Torricelli as the Democratic candidate should occur on all ballots - including absentee and military ballots, some 1,600 of which already have been mailed.

"But, in the case of Torricelli's campaign, there have been no extraordinary developments that would preclude him from remaining a valid candidate - he hasn't been indicted or convicted, he didn't die and he isn't sick. The only new development in Torricelli's candidacy was that recent polls have said he was not going to win."


THE GREAT (D-NJ) SENATOR FRANK WON THAT ELECTION.


http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demCHEATocrat.htm 


FAST FORWARD TO TODAY: NJ SUPREME COURT CAN NOW INSTALL THEIR OWN JUDGES BYPASSING THE PEOPLE ALTOGETHER.


New Jersey Supreme Court Chief Justice Stuart Rabner then took a step which raised the specter of possible coordination between Rabner and Sweeney by unconstitutionally elevating Edwin Stern, a Court of Appeals judge to the New Jersey Supreme Court (thus bypassing Christie’s right to nominate the next appointee, and the Senate’s vote on confirmation of that nominee), despite the fact that the New Jersey Supreme Court had a five-member quorum even in Wallace’s absence.

http://henrypatrick1736.blogspot.com/2010/12/jersey-shores-fight-for-justice.html


JERSEY COURTS PREFER TO PICK AND CHOOSE WHICH CONSTITUTION THEY FOLLOW IF AND WHEN IT SUITS THEM BYPASSING ONCE AMENDMENT II OF THE CONSTITUTION.

Amendment II. 
(Ratified December 15, 1791)
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

“A late flight landed Utah gun owner Greg Revell in jail for 10 days after he got stranded in New Jersey with an unloaded firearm he had legally checked with his luggage in Salt Lake City, And he was then arrested, going through a nightmare that included “10 days in several different jails”—and think about that, and the type of terrifying population they had this man immersed in. He had charges hanging over his head for months, and his private property confiscated for years.

HIS RIGHTS TO SUE WAS DEBUNKED BY THE JERSEY SHORE COURTS.
Photo: Jeff Zelevansky/Getty Images
"NJ Lower courts have thrown out his lawsuit"

http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-national/new-jersey-gun-case-demonstrates-no-justice-possible-through-lawful-avenues


IS THIS A COURT OF CIVILITY OR A COURT MADE IN THE IMAGE OF ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM. WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE IN THIS AMENDMENT IV OF THE CONSTITUTION.


Amendment IV. 
(Ratified December 15, 1791)


The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


The New Jersey Superior Court in Morris County has placed a gag order on the parties involved in the state's Division of Youth and Family Services case against Christian homeschooling parents John and Carolyn Jackson.
This case has been going on since last spring, with, to my knowledge, no imposed restrictions on communications.


"To immediately withdraw the children from the home without any evidence of wrongdoing is devastating and frightening. If it could happen to this family, it could happen to anybody."


THIS COURT IS BORDERING ON TYRANNY AGAINST WE THE PEOPLE. I SAY FURTHER THIS COURT IS TYRANNICAL.



http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=253657

No comments:

Post a Comment