THE TYRANT WE CALL SENATOR HARRY REID (D-NV) WHO DOES NOT WANT CONSTITUTIONAL WE THE PEOPLE TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES BUT HE WILL FORCE AN AGENDA IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT BY PROCEDURAL GIMMICKS TO PASS HIS LOVELY OBAMACARE 3 YEARS AGO NOW HE CLAIMS ITS LAW BUT HIS LAW IGNORES CONGRESS AS THE HOUSE ONLY AND NOT THE SENATE CAN COLLECT REVENUE

 

Amendment I.
(Ratified December 15, 1791)

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

In the background and hidden away from the general public, the lawsuit Sissel vs. US Dept. of Health and Human Services moves forward and is one step closer the US Supreme Court.  President Obama, Sen. Harry Reid and the liberal mainstream media don’t want any of you to know about this lawsuit that could remove the very heart of Obamacare – the insurance mandate.

The lawsuit is based upon Article 1, Section 7 of the United States Constitution, commonly known as the Origination Clause, which states:

“All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.”

Once the Supreme Court ruled that the insurance mandate was a tax, that meant the bill violated this section of the Constitution.  The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Matt Sissel by Pacific Legal Foundation, contends that the bill that became known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act originated in the US Senate and not the House, as required by the Constitution.  They claim that Sen. Harry Reid used procedural gimmicks to launch the bill and therefore Obamacare violates the Origination Clause.

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/12645/supreme-court-may-get-second-chance-kill-obamacares-insurance-mandate/#ixzz2fxsev31y