THE QUESTION ARISES WHAT IS CONGRESS FOR WHEN THE POTUS WITH GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION IN HAND WITH THE ALMIGHTY PINNACLE PEN CAN REGULATE THE LIVES OF EVERYDAY AMERICANS WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL–WHAT DO WE REALLY HAVE AS A CONSTITUTIONAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT OR A KING GEORGE FORM OF GOVERNMENT CAUSE ME POTUS AND WHAT ME SAY GOES–RUSH DETAILS 2,000 LAWS WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL HEARING–THE CLAIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOR AKA IMPEACHMENT

If the U.S. Constitution requires “high crimes and misdemeanors” to justify impeaching a president, talk-radio giant Rush Limbaugh reasoned on his program Thursday, would nearly 2,000 illegal actions be enough to qualify?

Limbaugh quoted a July 29 Washington Post article by Juliet Eilperin – whom Rush called “so in the tank for Democrats it’s impossible to categorize” – that nonetheless reported the Obama administration has put into force 1,800 “technically illegal” executive branch regulations since 2012 alone.

“Over the past 2 1/2 years, the Obama administration has published hundreds of rules – on how wheelchairs should be stowed aboard U.S. aircraft, how foreign trade zones should be regulated, how voting assistance should be provided for U.S. citizens overseas and so on,” Eilperin reported. “There’s a problem, however: Technically speaking, these and about 1,800 other regulations shouldn’t be in effect, because they weren’t reported to Congress as required.”

In fact, according to Eiliperin’s report, Robert Cramer of the Government Accountability Office explained Obama’s failure to report the regulations to Congress is a “technical violation” of a 1996 statute and said, “The law says they can’t take effect.”

Nonetheless, they have.

“Since 2012, this administration has simply implemented nearly 2,000 regulations they didn’t report to anybody except the enforcement agencies. Two thousand!” Limbaugh exclaimed. “President Obama has just created 2,000 laws without Congress and without telling Congress. High crimes and misdemeanors!

“He’s acting outside the authority granted him by the Constitution over and over and over again, and yet, Republicans say his behavior has not risen to the level of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’” Limbaugh continued. “They’re just bending over every which way possible to try to convince people that they don’t hate Obama.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/rush-how-bout-these-high-crimes-misdemeanors/?cat_orig=politics

THE EBOLA CRISIS NOT ENOUGH TO CLOSE THE US BORDER WITH MEXICO FROM THE DEMOCRAT POTUS BHO–THIS CRISIS IS NOT HIGH ENOUGH ON HIS RADAR SCREEN SINCE AMNESTY IS THE AGENDA FIRST

From overflowing morgues to corpses being pushed around in wheelbarrows, a British aid worker today reveals the horror she has seen battling to tackle the Ebola outbreak in West Africa .

Sanitation expert Cokie van der Velde, 54, spent last week helping with charity Medecins Sans Frontieres at a treatment centre in Liberian capital Monrovia and a hospital isolation ward three hours away.

And the grandmother revealed that six of the nurses she worked with have died from the virus.

Yesterday Cokie, of Whixley, North Yorkshire, said: “It is heartbreaking to see such brave people perishing at the hands of this awful disease.”

The recent outbreak, the largest recorded in history, began in Guinea and spread to Liberia and Sierra Leone, killing more than 700 people.

The World Health Organisation said that 60 medics had so far died in West Africa, falling ill as they bravely battled to save other people.

Meanwhile, American aid workers Dr Kent Brantly and Nancy Writebol, who were infected as they helped patients in Liberia, were last night being flown home for treatment.

Despite the risks, Cokie plans to return to the region next month. Here, we share her experiences of the terrible suffering engulfing West Africa...

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ebola-virus-british-aid-workers-3956692

THE WARREN BUFFET OIL TRAIN GETS ANOTHER BOOST OVER THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE AND THE DEMOCRATS PLAY ALONG WITH THEIR LEADER THE POTUS BHO SHELVING NORTH AMERICAN OIL OVER THE MIDDLE EAST IN DRIVING FUEL COST FOR ALL AMERICANS–SO LET’S TRANSPORT OIL THE VANDERBELT WAY IN TODAYS TIME THE WARREN BUFFET WAY INSTEAD OF BUILDING THE LINK FROM CANADA AND ALASKA AS THE BUFFET SWIMS IN PROFIT OVER AMERICANS ENERGY NEEDS THE RESULT IS FOOD AND CLOTHING GETS HIGH IN PRICE

The Obama administration Friday formally published proposals in the Federal Register to strengthen safety rules for trains carrying crude oil and other fuels, kicking off a two-month period in which the public can comment.

The proposals were prompted chiefly by the recent increase in oil shipped by rail from drilling in North Dakota's Bakken formation, which Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said last week necessitates “a new world order on how this stuff moves.” A train carrying crude derailed in Quebec last year, setting off an explosion that killed 47 people.

The Department of Transportation (DOT) proposed phasing out old rail cars for oil and other flammable liquids like ethanol, implementing new speed and braking standards for the trains and establishing a new testing and classification system for the fuels.

Foxx called the rules “the most significant progress” in protecting the country from explosions caused by trains carrying Bakken crude.

The department said it wants comments on three different possible rules for speed limits and three different options for the thickness of steel on cars.

The DOT also said it was not likely to extend the comment period beyond the 60-day standard, “given the urgency of the safety issues addressed in these proposals.”

Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/214050-comment-period-starts-for-oil-train-rules

THE POTUS OF CHAOS BHO GETS KICKED BY THE PUTIN WITH THE POSSIBLE BREACH OF THE 1987 NUCLEAR MISSSILE TREATY AS THE RUSSIA PUTIN TESTS NEW CRUISE MISSILE WARHEADS - OH WHAT WILL THE DEMOCRATS IN THE SENATE DO ABOUT THIS–PROBABLY BOW AS ONLY A DEMOCRAT CAN DUE–AS ITS WEAKEN POTUS HAS DONE OVER THE PUTIN–AND THE LIKES OF ROBERT MENENDEZ (D-NJ) FULL OF HIS OWN SKELETON IN THE CLOSET SCANDAL WITH PROSTITUTES IT SEEM AS POSSIBLY COVERED UP

Senior lawmakers say it's too early to say if the U.S. should withdraw from a historic arms control deal that has allegedly been breached by Russia.

President Obama spoke with Russian president Vladimir Putin on Friday about Moscow’s compliance with the 1987 nuclear missile treaty.

The U.S. charges Russia violated the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty when it tested a banned cruise missile.

The call came one day after the Russian Foreign Ministry dismissed the administration’s accusations as “unfounded,” adding to the deepening rift that between Washington and Moscow.

The U.S. imposed a new round of sanctions on Russia this week over Moscow’s meddling in Ukraine, where it is accused of providing weapons and training to insurgents fighting that country’s government.

Lawmakers said a U.S. withdrawal from the arms treaty should not be a first step, but should also not be off the table.

“I’d rather put the onus on the Russians than to take the position that we have to withdraw,” Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told The Hill. “But obviously if the Russians are unwilling to come into compliance, then you have to consider all options.”

“I think that there’s more of push towards getting Russia to come clean,” said Sen. Bob Corker (Tenn.), the panel’s top Republican. “That’s the first step, in treaties like this, people wish to take.”

Corker said he thinks there’s no question that Moscow broke the agreement.

Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/defense/214112-us-russia-rift-deepens-questions-about-arms-treaty