PASSING THE TORCH FROM CARTER TO OBAMA & DEATH PANEL

"My Crow name is 'One Who Helps People Throughout the Land,'" Obama said.

(THIS IS A MISNOMER WHEN THAT ONE'S MIDDLE NAME  IS DESTRUCTION
IT SHOULD BE THAT ONE MAN SPEAKS WITH A FORK TONGUE)

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been softening the ground for this Obama policy for some months. The U.S. Department of State indicates on its website that it has completed a "policy review" and "tribal consultation" on the indigenous peoples treaty in recent weeks.


http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=243153

WHEN YOU HAVE LIBERALS BELIEVE IN ABORTION OF BABIES AND NOW WHEN OLDER THEY WANT TO ABORT YOUR LIFE, IT'S NO WONDER THEY THINK THIS WAY. LIFE TO THESE PEOPLE ARE MEANINGLESS AS SO FAR COMPARED FROM WE THE PEOPLE WHERE LIFE IS HELD PRECIOUS UNTIL DEATH.

SARAH PALIN WAS RIGHT.

White House attempts to quiet revived talk of 'death panels'
By Jason Millman - 12/27/10 09:31 AM ET

The Obama administration is trying to quiet talk about so-called “death panels” after The New York Times reported Sunday that a new Medicare regulation includes incentives for end-of-life-care planning.

The Medicare policy will pay doctors for holding end-of-life-care discussions with patients, according to the Times. A similar provision was dropped from the new healthcare reform law after Republicans accused the administration of withholding care from the sick, elderly and disabled.

Sarah Palin, a possible Republican presidential candidate in 2012, sparked controversy last summer when she said the reform law's end-of-life provision would create “death panels,” in which “government bureaucrats” would decide who receives care. President Obama countered the claim by saying his administration didn’t want to “pull the plug on grandma."

http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementation/135167-white-house-tries-to-smother-new-death-panel-talk

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), author of Section 1233, was delighted. "Mr. Blumenauer's office celebrated 'a quiet victory,' but urged supporters not to crow about it," reports the New York Times. Deathly quiet. In early November, his office sent an e-mail plea to supporters: "We would ask that you not broadcast this accomplishment out to any of your lists . . . e-mails can too easily be forwarded." They had been lucky that "thus far, it seems that no press or blogs have discovered it. . . . The longer this [regulation] goes unnoticed, the better our chances of keeping it."

So much for the Democrats' transparency - and for their repeated claim that the more people learn what is in the health-care law, the more they will like it. Turns out ignorance is the Democrats' best hope.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/30/AR2010123003047.html?wpisrc=nl_pmopinions

SENATORS TO BE HELD TO BUDGET CUTS ON EVERY BILL IN 2011

GOP Sen.-elect Paul: Attach spending cuts to every 'major' bill

By Jordan Fabian - 12/27/10 04:22 PM ET

GOP Sen.-elect Rand Paul said Monday that he wants to attach spending cuts to every piece of major legislation that comes before the Senate next year.
Paul (Ky.) — who won his race with strong support from the Tea Party movement — said that he will "pressure" Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to take simple majority votes on spending cut amendments in the next Congress.

"I think that every piece of major legislation that goes forward from now on needs to have attached to it spending cuts," Paul said during a podcast with conservative blogger Ben Domenech. If Congress is serious about the nation's ballooning debt and deficits, "We have to be serious and introduce spending cuts.


http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/135223-rand-paul-attach-spending-cuts-to-every-major-bill

MORE ON THE 111TH CONGRESS - SAY BYE BYE

Examiner Editorial: Closing the books on the worst Congress

Comments (50) Share Print

By: Examiner Editorial 12/25/10 8:05 PM

Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Americans can give thanks in this Christmas season for an end to the reckless and destructive 111th Congress. This is the Congress that passed Obamacare, against the wishes of a substantial majority of the public, on Christmas Eve of last year. In the dead of night, Democratic lawmakers stuffed the monstrous 2,700-page bill with special-interest goodies and political payoffs like the "Cornhusker Kickback" and the "Louisiana Purchase." As we have learned since, most members were still ignorant of the bill's contents three months later, when it gained final passage in the House. No surprise that its immediate results -- both intended and unintended -- have been almost uniformly bad.

Similarly, odds are that not one member of the 111th Congress actually read the so-called "cap-and-trade" bill before it passed the House in June 2009. Even a speed-reader could not have digested House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman's last-second, 309-page amendment, which read as clear as mud: "Page 14, strike lines 1 through 3 and insert the following. ..." It was filed after 1:30 a.m. just before the vote on final passage. There is also serious doubt that any member of Congress understood the 2,000-page financial reform bill that Congress passed this summer. One of its two main sponsors, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., remarked, "No one will know until this is actually in place how it works. But we believe we've done something that has been needed for a long time. ..."

And Democrats wonder why Gallup found this Congress to be the least popular in the history of its polls?

After suffering a comprehensive and humiliating defeat in the midterm election, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and the unfrocked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi led lame-duck congressional Democrats on a last-minute banzai charge for more federal spending, debt, earmarks, taxes and regulations. They unsuccessfully pushed for the biggest tax increase in American history, a yearlong spending bill loaded with pork, and a DREAM Act to award amnesty to certain children of illegal immigrants. We hope that voters will remember these misguided initiatives in two years.

Our Founding Fathers were always wary of those who wanted government to do lots of big things. That's why they created a system that separated powers among three more or less equal branches and provided each of them with powerful checks and balances. When professional politicians become frustrated with Congress, it is a sign that our system is working as intended. Columbia University historian Alan Brinkley told Bloomberg News recently that "this is probably the most productive session of Congress since at least the '60s." When Congress votes on bills that no one reads or understands, it can be quite "productive." Americans have already rendered a verdict on such productivity and elected a new Congress with orders to clean up the mess in Washington.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2010/12/examiner-editorial-closing-books-worst-congress#ixzz19Gzgc5XH

 JUST THIS DECADE ALONE CONGRESS HAS PASSED INTO LAW 2,735. THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS. ARE "WE THE PEOPLE" CANNOT LIVE AS INDEPENDENT ANYMORE? EVERY PERSON OUGHT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEMSELVES AND NOT HAVE GOVERNMENT CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF OUR VERY LIVES.

1999-2000       106th  - PASSED INTO LAW 580 BILLS
2001-2002       107th - PASSED INTO LAW 377 BILLS
2003-2004       108th - PASSED INTO LAW 498 BILLS
2005-2006       109th - PASSED INTO LAW 482 BILLS
2007-2008       110th - PASSED INTO LAW 456 BILLS
2009-2010       111th  -  PASSED INTO LAW 342 BILLS


(111th passed Obamacare - 2010, cap-and-trade - 2009, financial reform bill - 2010, START TREATY 2010, DADT 2010, Stimulus two 2010, Reparation loan 2010 )

search from:
http://thomas.loc.gov/home/LegislativeData.php?&n=BSS&c=110

THE REAL FACE OF YESHUA

I WATCH THE HISTORY CHANNEL THIS EVENING AND JUST HAPPEN TO HAVE SEEN THIS EPISODE ON YESHUA.

http://raydowning.com/our-store/jesus-resurrected.html

http://raydowning.com/our-store/jesus-in-death.html

See HISTORY:

http://www.history.com/shows/the-real-face-of-jesus


In HISTORY’s The Real Face of Jesus?, a team of computer graphics artists uses cutting-edge 3D technology to answer a question that has captivated painters, sculptors, scholars and theologians for hundreds of years: What did Jesus Christ look like?

Led by Ray Downing of Studio Macbeth, these digital wizards are no strangers to reconstructing important figures for HISTORY. In 2009, they created a living, moving model of Abraham Lincoln for his bicentennial, basing it on more than 100 photographs of the 16th U.S. president. But this time, their only guide is a centuries-old cloth that many believe was Jesus’ burial shroud. Known as the Shroud of Turin, this 14-foot piece of linen bears a faint, ghostly image of a crucified man, along with dark red stains that some researchers have identified as blood.

To attempt this unprecedented feat of science and technology, Ray and his associates must rely on the most sophisticated electronic tools and software available. They must also seek out the knowledge of scientists and researchers who have grappled with the Shroud of Turin’s many mysteries. As part of their yearlong quest, Ray and his associates visit John Jackson of Colorado’s Turin Shroud Center, who in 1978 was given exclusive access to the cloth for five days of intensive scientific examination. Jackson and others have posited that the image on the Shroud of Turin contains unique three-dimensional information in the form of shading variations that indicate how close the body was from the cloth. The tip of the nose, for instance, appears darker because it was near or touching the linen at the time the imprint was formed. As Ray explains it, “It is as if there is an instruction set inside a picture for building a sculpture.”

Ray and his team use this logic as they coax a 3D model out of the two-dimensional artifact. Months into the endeavor, they realize that the fabric would have been wrapped around the face of the man buried beneath it. Thanks to this breakthrough, they can finally account for and remove the distortion in the image, achieving an accurate and lifelike 3D portrait of the man in the shroud—of a face both hidden and preserved in time.


http://www.history.com/shows/the-real-face-of-jesus/articles/the-technology








SEE THE SCIENCE BEHIND THE IMAGE: http://news.discovery.com/videos/tech-shroud-of-turin-goes-digital.html